Products
Read more
Redefine Firepower
The threat to Taiwan is not a distant regional issue — it’s a direct challenge to global stability and the foundation of the modern economy. Taiwan produces over 60% of the world’s semiconductors and more than 90% of the most advanced chips that power everything from fighter jets to smartphones. A Chinese blockade or invasion wouldn’t just redraw borders — it would paralyze global supply chains, cripple U.S. manufacturing, and trigger the most severe economic shock in decades. But the consequences go deeper than silicon. If China can take Taiwan by force, it signals to the world that authoritarian coercion triumphs over democratic self-determination. Allies in the Indo-Pacific would question U.S. resolve; adversaries would grow bolder. The loss of Taiwan wouldn’t only be the loss of a key partner — it would mark the erosion of the very system of free enterprise and open technology that underpins our way of life. The front line of deterrence and innovation is no longer an ocean away — it’s the integrity of the networks, factories, and freedoms we depend on every day.
Valkryn exists because we refuse to let fragility dictate who lives and who dies, whose ideas survive and whose are buried.
Our mission is clear: We will protect lives, renew trust, and defend global security and sovereignty by providing the products and capacity that will deter conflict at the global stage.
The decisive advantage in modern conflict will not come from weapons alone. It will come from the speed,adaptability, and scale of how we design and produce them.
Companies like Shield AI, Castelion,Mach, Saronic, and Anduril have shown what’s possible when Silicon Valley urgency collides with defense necessity. They have bent timelines, challenged the primes, and delivered breakthrough systems to the field. We celebrate their work, because it proves that the defense industrial base no longer needs to accept the slow, brittle models of the past.
But these approaches, bold as they are, stop short of solving the central problem.
“Our weakness is not invention. Our weakness is execution.”
Some focus too narrowly oncutting-edge products—autonomy, AI-driven drones, advanced platforms. Thesematter. But product innovation alone will not secure the future. China can outpace us at hardware iteration.We’ve seen it already: on Monday, emerging U.S. defense-tech companies demo newcapabilities. By Friday, Chinese state media showcases the replica. A newdrone, missile, or sensor is not the bottleneck. The bottleneck is theindustrial base that builds them.
Others, like Anduril, are pursuinghyper-scale defense production, modeling their ethos after Tesla’s reinventionof automobile manufacturing. This too is necessary. But centralization andvertical integration—one company owning the entire stack—cannot scale fastenough and cannot democratize access.
A factory of the future in onelocation is still a factory with walls
The best ideas often come frominventors, engineers, and innovators outside the traditional production base.But today, they are locked out.
Their work dies in pitch decks,SBIR programs, and research labs. In Silicon Valley, a single engineer can gofrom prototype to scaled deployment in weeks. In defense, that same engineermust hand their idea into layers of bureaucracy and hope it survives thegauntlet of procurement and manufacturing bottlenecks.
We believe this is unacceptable.
“The arsenal of the future mustcollapse the wall between invention and production.”
The future arsenal must giveinventors not just a voice, but a factory at their fingertips.
It must allow the bestideas—wherever they originate—to move instantly from prototype to production,from one to thousands, from concept to capability.
An open-source industrialarchitecture is the only path forward.
This is not a matter ofconvenience.
It is a matter of sovereignty.
The United States does not sufferfrom a lack of innovation. We suffer from a lack of access.
At every level of defenseproduction, capacity is trapped behind walls — physical walls, organizationalwalls, bureaucratic walls. Ideas may emerge anywhere, but execution iscentralized. That centralization is our greatest vulnerability.
“Centralization createsbottlenecks. Bottlenecks break under pressure.”
Legacy primes operate massive,non-integrated production chains. They are slow to adapt, brittle in crisis,and designed for predictable, decades-long programs.
Even the boldest new entrants —those building “factories of the future” — risk replicating the same flaw. Avertically integrated hyperscale plant in one city, no matter how advanced, isstill a single point of failure.
When capacity is centralized, scaleis fragile. A strike, a cyber attack, a supply chain disruption, a single missile — and the arsenal shatters.
“Factories do not scale. Networks scale.”
True scale is not found in bigger facilities. True scale is found in distributed systems, linked by software, flowing like a living network. Centralization concentrates risk. Distribution creates resilience.
When production is spread across many nodes — Mjolnir forward-deployed prototyping hubs, Atlas geo-dispersed manufacturing sites — capacity no longer depends on any single location. Scale becomes anti-fragile: the more nodes added, the stronger the system becomes.
“Execution must not belong to onecompany. It must belong to the ecosystem.”
Centralization keeps inventors locked out. It says: your idea can enter, but only if it passesthrough our gates. Distribution tears down the gates. It gives inventors directaccess to capacity, tethered by operational software, not owned by a single firm.
Centralization belongs to the last century.
Distribution belongs to this one.
The defense industrial base does not need another vertically integrated behemoth. It needs an open-source industrial architecture — one that turns many into one,without walls, without choke points, without fragility.
Centralization is the enemy of scale.
Distribution is the foundation of sovereignty.
Centralization is brittle. Distribution is resilient. The arsenal of the future will notbe a monolith. It will be a network.
“Scale comes not from buildingbigger. Scale comes from building everywhere.”
The problem with centralized capacity is not just fragility. It is exclusion. When factories are few, access israre. Only select companies, select programs, select ideas make it through thegates. Everyone else waits outside. A distributed arsenal changes that. Instead of one factory with walls, imagine many nodes with no gatekeepers — all synchronized by a shared operational backbone. This is the architecture Valkryn is building.
Mjolnir: Forward-Deployed Prototyping
Innovation must move at the speed of conflict. Mjolnir is a network of forward-deployable, software-tethered prototyping hubs —facilities that can be spun up at the edge of operations or at the heart of allied industrial zones. If you can imagine it, you can build it. If you can build it, you can test it. Ifyou can test it, you can field it. Not in years. In days. Mjolnir collapses the timeline between idea and prototype. It gives inventors immediate access to tools, machines, and digital integration, no matter where they are. It is modular and mobile, able to generate prototypes wherever the need arises.It collapses the distance between inventor and execution, turning imagination into hardware without waiting for bureaucracy to catch up
Atlas: Geo-Dispersed Mass Manufacturing
Once proven, ideas must scale. Atlas is a network of manufacturing hubs spread across allied nations, digitallysynchronized by OdinOS. Prototypes flow directly from Mjolnir into Atlas, carrying their full digital thread withthem. Production can surge anywhere in the network, without waiting for a single factory to catch up. By distributing production, Atlas eliminates single points of failure. It builds resilience into the arsenal itself: disruption in one node strengthens the others. Atlas takes what Mjolnir proves and scales it. It is a geo-dispersed manufacturing network, spanning allied nations and designed to surge at speed. No single site holds the keys; production can flow across the network seamlessly. If one node is disrupted, the others take on the load. Resilience is baked into the architecture itself.
Together, Mjolnir and Atlas form a living, adaptive, distributed arsenal. One that empowers inventors, strengthens allies, and scales faster than any adversary can copy. This is not theory. This is not a thought experiment. It is a new industrial model.
It is the only path to sovereignty.
Hardware does not scale itself. Factories do not coordinate themselves. Networks do not synchronize themselves. Software does.
This is why Tesla and SpaceX wereable to achieve what legacy automakers and space could not. The world saw the car. The world saw the rocket. Few saw the system behind it. WARP was theinvisible backbone — the real-time operating system that connected design, supply chain, production, and delivery into one seamless execution engine.
Tesla did not just build cars. They built an industrial nervous system.
“Without software, factories are buildings. With software, factories are alive.”
Indefense manufacturing today, the nervous system is missing. ERP, MES, PLM, WMS— each runs its own isolated loop, fragmented and slow. Data gets stuck.Decisions lag. Execution dies in the gaps.
Thatis why Valkrynis building OdinOS: the end-to-end operational backbone that binds Mjolnir and Atlas into a living, distributed arsenal.
OdinOS makes every node part of the same system
•A design created in one Mjolnir hub carries its full digital thread into Atlasfor mass production.
•Supply chain data flows instantly into planning.
•Quality issues surface and propagate across the network in real time.
•Inventory, work instructions, and test results are visible to every node, everyoperator, every partner.
•The entire operational execution chain can be executed and stored in the samesystem.
OdinOS collapses the distance between idea and execution, between one factory and many. It is not another piece of software. It is the operating system of the arsenal itself.
“Executionis not about machines. Execution is about information.”
Our adversaries can replicate hardware. They cannot replicate speed of execution if it is built on software designed for scale. Palantir knows this – however, the ontology is only necessary when the underlying systems of truth fail in the first place.
OdinOS ensures that every inventor’s prototype has a pathway to production. Every node in the network has the same data, the same context, the same ability to act. No silos. No walls. No choke points. Only 1st principles execution.
The arsenal of the future will not be held together by contracts or institutions. It will be held together by code.
By OdinOS.
The defense industrial base does not lack ideas. It does not lack talent. It does not lack ambition. It lacks the ability to execute at the scale and speed modern conflict demands. Hyper-scale cannot be achieved bybuilding bigger factories. Hyper-scale is achieved by building networks of execution. True scale is not the output of onecompany. True scale is the output of anecosystem.
Mjolnir ensures that invention never dies in a lab — that ideas can be prototyped instantly, anywhere.
Atlas ensures that what works can be scaled everywhere, across allied nations, without single points of failure.
OdinOS ensures that every node is synchronized, every part traceable, every decision connected.
Together, they form a living arsenal — one that grows stronger the more nodes are added, the more inventorsare empowered, the more allies are connected.
The future will not wait for bureaucracy. Adversaries will not wait for procurement cycles. The question is not whether we will innovate. The question is whether we can execute at scale, faster than anyone else. The United States once built the Arsenal of Democracy. That was a different century, a different war, and adifferent industrial base. Today, we must forge something new. Not a rebuilt arsenal. A distributed one. A living one.
This is what Valkryn exists to do:
To collapse the wall betweeninvention and production. To deliver capacity directly to the inventor. To build an industrial base that is not brittle, but unbreakable.
Subtitle: The Infrastructure of the Future
